A Great Improvisation: Franklin, France, And the Birth of America

Stacy Schiff is one of my favorite living historians. Another is Ron Chernow, the Pulitzer Prize-winning author of “Alexander Hamilton.” Here is what Chernow has to say about Schiff: “Even if forced at gunpoint, Stacy Schiff would be incapable of writing a dull page or a lame sentence.”It’s true; Schiff has the unique ability to bring the distant past to life, all to our collective benefit. Compared to Ptolemaic Egypt (“Cleopatra”) or Puritan New England (“Witches”), capturing the pulse of diplomatic life in late eighteenth-century France is a cinch for her.“The Great Improvisation” is a great read. There are many reasons to recommend it. First is Schiff’s wonderful sense of irreverent wit. For instance, when discussing the parade of dubious French officers seeking a commission to fight in America she quips, “The French nobility included a fair number of eight-year-old majors and fourteen-year-old colonels, every one of them burning to be nineteen-year-old generals.” Or when Temple Franklin, Benjamin’s grandson and unofficial secretary in France, got his mistress pregnant, Schiff notes that the unfortunate young woman had born “Franklin’s illegitimate son’s illegitimate son an illegitimate son.”But probably the best reason to recommend “The Great Improvisation” is that it offers a clear window into the machinations of the American delegation in Paris during the War of Independence. Schiff’s core thesis is simple: “France was crucial to American independence, and Franklin was critical to France.” She constructs her delightful narrative around this argument.Schiff calls the American delegation a “great improvisation” for good reason. The inchoate nation in rebellion against the British had no experience at statecraft, little understanding of the recondite procedures required to conduct diplomatic affairs at the courts of European nobility, and no financial credit upon which to draw to equip an army of farmers and mechanics. Congress sent the best tool they had at their disposal: Benjamin Franklin. It was an inspired choice, according to Schiff: “Franklin was a natural diplomat, genial and ruthless… [His] stature was the most the dangerous weapon in the American arsenal.”“The obvious man for the job on one side of the ocean [Franklin],” Schiff writes, “He was the ideal man on the other.” The French adored Franklin from the moment he landed on their shores in November 1776. He embodied everything the French wished America represented: modesty, industry, and virility. He was the tamer of lightning, proof that nature ennobled the gifted. Nevertheless, Franklin was embarking into uncharted waters. “He was inventing American foreign policy from whole cloth,” Schiff says, “teaching himself diplomacy on the job, while serving as his country’s unofficial banker.” Franklin was particularly poorly suited for the latter responsibility, according to Schiff. “By nature Franklin was a streamliner and a simplifier, while everything about the procurement business was baroque and protracted”France may have loved their new American ambassador, but the same cannot be said for Franklin’s fellow American representatives to Europe; almost every other American sent across the Atlantic on a diplomatic mission came to despise him. “The higher Franklin rose in the [French] public pantheon,” Schiff writes, “the lower he sank in the estimation of his colleagues.” Arthur Lee, a Virginian appointed envoy to Prussia and Spain, called Franklin “the most corrupt of all men.” Ralph Izard, a South Carolinian who served as the commissioner to the Court of Tuscany, noted in his diary, “Dr. Franklin was one of the most unprincipled men upon earth: that he was a man of no veracity, no honor, no integrity, as great a villain as ever breathed.” John Adams, the future president and fellow delegate to France, had for Franklin “no other sentiments than contempt or abhorrence...” [he was] “the demon of discord among our ministers, and curse and scourge of our foreign affairs.” His only ally, besides his grandson, was Silas Deane, the Connecticut lawyer originally sent to France as a secret envoy in 1776, who was recalled by Congress in light of allegations of financial impropriety. Indeed, the rancor, backstabbing, and competing personal alliances that Schiff describes makes the American delegation at Valentois outside Versailles sound like a contemporary reality TV show: part Downton Abbey, part Real Housewives of New Jersey.Schiff is far more forgiving of Franklin’s behavior during his nearly decade-long mission to Paris. She believes that the trouble between the commissioners could be chalked up to “miscommunication, misapprehension, and misrepresentation.” Yes, Franklin had a tendency to sleep late, not answer his mail, spend too much time with female admirers, keep poor records, and not share information freely with his co-commissioners, but he was, nevertheless, indispensable to the American mission at the court of Louis XVI. Schiff maintains that the American cause could not have survived without the French – it was “her bedrock, her polestar, her salvation” – and the French alliance may very well never have come off without Franklin. Vergennes, the French Foreign Minister, conceded “[Franklin’s] age and his love of tranquility leave him with an apathy incompatible with his responsibilities,” but defended his position as essential to maintaining strong Franco-American relations.Franklin was never given his proper due for his service abroad, according to Schiff. He returned home under a cloud of suspicion, stoked in Congress by his erstwhile co-delegates, and harbored resentment about his treatment for the rest of his life. It didn’t help that “Massive obscurity reigned in Congress as to how much aid France had extended America, and on what terms,” primarily because Franklin had failed to accurately record many of the transactions. But he was successful in getting the French to back the American cause with loans, weapons, military sundries, and – perhaps most important of all – naval support, without which the revolution would have been doomed. (The one thing the French sent that the Americans had no use for was those 19-year-old French generals.)Like all of Schiff’s books, “The Great Improvisation” is highly recommended: it’s fun, insightful, and educational.

a well-written history of how Franklin was able to secure funding and supplies from France to keep the American Revolution alive.

The book arrived as expected. I’m enjoying it but haven’t finished reading it yet.

Stacy Schiff makes us wonder how a wounded, ailing fledgling dis-United States ever established itself and ultimately thrived. In "The Great Improvisation" she shows us the reasons for Benjamin Franklin's lifelong successes--a comprehensive ability to be whatever his customers need him to be. In this case his customers are the bureaucrats of King Louis's court, the French women who flock to his side, the natural philosophers (scientists) and literati of Europe, and nearly everyone except his fellow American representatives to French and other European powers for a single purpose: the Colonies are flat broke and need money, lots of money, to outfit their ragged, generally undisciplined militiamen, buy arms and ammunition, and simply survive long enough to outmaneuver and outlast the British army and King George. By planned and unplanned procrastination, skullduggeries, silences, lack of correspondences, obfuscations, avoidances and outright lies Franklin frustrates and infuriates the likes of John Adams and other American emissaries to European courts yet squeezes out of the French funds and arms for the rebel Americans, significantly contributing to French financial ruin and its own bloody Revolution. The real delight here is less history than personalities as Ms. Schiff "gives us the dirt" on the cadre of conniving Colonial contenders for Franklin's crown; the backbiting and pettiness of Adams and other major diplomats, their jealousies of Franklin, and their rancid attempts to have him replaced read like a bad diplomatic romance novel. In fairness Ms. Schiff does not spare Franklin for his abuses: a paucity of dispatches back to the Colonial government; his abysmal family morals and behavior toward his wife and son; his slackard's ways at critical moments; and his avoidance of confrontations that turn petty grievances into major disruptions. Thankfully his tormentors are far bigger scoundrels than he, the French--especially its well-educated and aristocratic women--love rustic old Ben, and his scientific, literary and intellectual reputation consistently clears his paths of stones too big to walk over. In a nutshell, gout-ridden Franklin succeeds and saves his new nation from British victory.Ms. Schiff masterfully weaves a thousand and more strands and bits of human folly and achievement into a delightful, humorous tale of one man's often erring, sometimes stumbling but ultimate success in helping the Colonies become a nation, albeit still more states than united, and gives us a unique view of a man and the difficult birth of his nation. While you're reading and certainly when you've finished this laudable history, you may see present US politics as tame indeed, all the while wondering how we ever even managed to get started. An ugly, awkward birth it was, but thank the "man for all seasons" and any necessary reason for the USA ever finding itself on any world map as a nation. According to Ms. Schiff's account, the United States of America is truly a magnificent improvisation, and she knows who's to blame.

Loved the book. The depth of detail was stunning. Had to use my iPad dictionary to look up at least 2 words per page. This author does her research.