Hollyland Lark M2S Ultimate Combo (Camera RX+USB-C RX+Lightning RX) Wireless Lavalier Microphone for iPhone/Camera/Android/PC, Compact Mic, Titanium Clip, Noise Cancelling, Content Creation

If you're looking to improve your audio without diving into high-end or overly complex setups, the Hollyland Lark M2S is an excellent choice. I purchased the combo kit that includes adapters for iPhone, Android (USB-C), and standard 3.5mm cameras, and I’ve been thoroughly impressed with how versatile and user-friendly this system is.Compatibility and AccessoriesOne of the biggest advantages of this kit is how complete it is out of the box. It comes with:Two wireless lavalier microphonesThree types of receivers (USB-C, Lightning, and 3.5mm TRS)A clamshell-style charging caseWindscreens and a soft carrying pouchHaving multiple receiver types is perfect for content creators who work across devices. Whether I’m filming with my phone or camera, this set has me covered without needing to buy separate accessories.Audio QualityThe sound quality isn’t going to rival a professional boom mic or high-end XLR lav setup, but it’s significantly better than any built-in phone or DSLR microphone. The audio is clean, clear, and very usable for YouTube videos, TikToks, Instagram Reels, interviews, and vlogging. It’s especially ideal for solo or two-person talking-head videos, since you get two mics in the kit.Noise cancellation is built in and can be turned on or off. Personally, I found it slightly degrades the natural quality of the voice, so I recommend keeping it off unless you're in a really noisy environment. You can always remove background noise more cleanly in post-production if needed.Battery Life and ChargingThe microphones charge and store inside a compact, AirPods-style case that uses USB-C. It’s great for travel and daily use—everything stays charged, protected, and easy to find. I haven’t had any issues with battery life, and the case makes it simple to keep both mics ready to go.Clip-On DesignUnlike the Lark M2, which uses magnets, the M2S uses a traditional clip design. Some users may prefer magnets for discreet placement, but I’ve had no problems clipping the mic onto a shirt collar or even creatively attaching it to random objects like cups, wooden spoons, or props. It’s flexible enough to get creative with, and the clip holds securely.Range and SignalThe signal strength is solid as long as you're facing the receiver. Turning your back to the camera or walking too far away can interrupt the signal, but that’s typical of wireless mics in this price range. For casual or mid-range use, the advertised range feels accurate and reliable.Final ThoughtsThe Hollyland Lark M2S is a smart, well-rounded solution for creators who want better audio without a steep learning curve or excessive gear. It’s not perfect—the audio quality isn’t cinematic, and the noise cancellation can be a bit aggressive—but the price, portability, and ease of use make this kit more than worth it.If you’re shooting content across phones and cameras, or need a reliable solution for two-person setups, this is a fantastic tool to have in your kit.

I am a professional video creator, and I often use traditional lavaliere-style clip-on microphones on projects. For quite a while, I have been examining various wireless microphone packs, such as those made by DJI, Rode, Godox, and many others, because the convenience they could offer for projects was highly enticing. However, I have never pulled the trigger on one because in all the videos I have watched that use them, they all seemed to have the same shortcomings. The sound was thin and hollow, the mics were obnoxiously big, and the branding was far too overt for my taste. So when I came across these, I thought they would be worth a try, as at the very minimum, their design addressed my two visual and aesthetic concerns. For the relatively low price, I figured that even if the sound wasn't great, it would still be a worthwhile purchase because the sound would likely be usable for most purposes and could always be enhanced in post-production to bring it closer to what I typically look for. And so, I pulled the trigger. And I was impressed almost immediately.To give them a test that aligned with one of my most common use cases, I used them while conducting an interview. Since this was a paid project, I wasn't going to trust them immediately, so I went ahead and also recorded the interview using a boom microphone—a Sennheiser MKH416. This took place in a relatively large indoor space, specifically an indoor pickleball facility. I put M2S mics on the interviewee and myself. Using the receiver in stereo mode, I was able to run each mic to its own channel on my MixPre-3 recorder using a TRS to dual XLR cable. This ultimately gave me three channels to listen to in post: my $1000 shotgun mic and two channels of M2S audio. I was shocked, pleased, and more than a bit surprised to find that in this particular use case, the best audio of the mix came from the M2S.My interviewee was new to being on video. He was fidgety and moved around quite a bit, resulting in significant off-axis pickup from the shotgun mic. And while the space was very open, the metal walls and concrete floors resulted in a bit of echo and some slight comb filtering from the boom mic. But the sound from the M2S was constant and clear and even with the noise cancelation turned off, their was almost no echo or reverb picked up by the mics. And, to my further chagrin, the sound wasn't at all hollow or thin. It was full-bodied, with a nice low end and a clear top end. With just a slight enhancement, the audio was more than usable — it was pretty good. And while I could have probably used the audio from the boom mic on this project if I had to, it was a huge time saver to work with the audio tracks from the M2S instead.Do I expect these inexpensive microphones to outshine a pro-level boom mic on every project and in every scenario...absolutely not. However, their quality, combined with their ease of use and discreet size, impressed me enough that I have already purchased a second set, allowing me to have a set ready to go in each of my video production kits. They will not be my go to for every shoot, but they have proved their worth to me, and I can see them being a very useful tool on many projects to come.

Can’t say I’ve ever written a review but this deserved one. I work in content and media in professional sports and it’s incredibly important for me to have versatile, efficient and cost-friendly gear I can travel with. I was searching through video reviews, they mentioned these in comparison to the DJI mini mics and the price point was intriguing with similar reviews (and seemingly easier operation). I went for it.Pros: incredibly easy to set up and customize being it’s plug-and-play, great signal to noise ratio, can use far away from camera, design is inconspicuous and easy to use, price is unbeatableCons: sound is still a little “tinny” as I call it, but it’s FAR better and more professional than an iPhone mic.For clarity: We used these for a project going to a client with millions of followers if that helps you understand the benchmark. These things are the real deal and I’m stoked I went with them over DJI at the price point.

I needed something I could use with both my phone, ipad and LAPTOP. There are attachments for all three. The sound quality is bold and clear. Works fine for live streaming also. I like how small the mic is so that it's not so obvious on camera. Also, we didn't face any issues when using both mics at the same time.One heads up. We first experienced a crackling/popping sound throughout our recording. I was connected to my laptop using the USB-C cord. But I was connecting this cord into a USB extender. We discovered you should put the cord directly into the USB port of the laptop and not the extender. It immediately solved the problem.