Dune: Part Two (4K Ultra HD + Digital) [4K UHD]

ストーリー、映像美、共に最高傑作です。

壮大なスケールで、見応えありました。

今さらではありますが、この映画監督の世界観は、素晴らしい！そもそも、原作から見ても、映像化しにくい作品で、そう言えば、早川文庫では、石ノ森章太郎が挿絵をしていたような記憶があります、デビッドリンチの作品は、宇宙をワープして飛ぶシーンからその映像も含めて凄かったし、ハルコーネンの俗物ぶりも直球でしたが、盛り込み過ぎで、時間切れアウトでしたが、今回の作品は、時間とお金も凄くかかってて、しっかり原作小説の本質を突いていました。

内容が無いよね。と言うのもインスタ映え的な美を追求している訳でその時間が長、停止した映像ばかり！しかも肝心な部分は映像を作っておらず！何の意味があったの？の扱いである。実に装飾的で映画を何と思っているのでしょうね。又、元の作品では声を武器にしていたがそれは除かれている点、面白みが半減。グロイ表現の場面もカットされている！ホントインスタ映え的な映像のみで動きのない写真のようだ！4.5枚で済むインスタ映えを2時間余りも無理やり伸ばしている。退屈で一度には見る事の出来ない映画だ！元作品を見ていないなら何なのか全く分からないだろう。信じられないのは、1話で作り上げ、てんこ盛りSFであったのに対し、何ら意味が無い！分割したストーリー酷いものだ、話も深掘りは無い！ホントインスタ映え写真を見せる為の長い無駄な時間だ。

小説、昔の映画DUNEを見た人でも楽しめる、詳細ストーリーがちょっと変化あって、見てて楽しかった。

世界観はすごいしお金も掛かってる映像。映像はすごい。

見ていて無理やり感がなく没入して楽しめました。 続編が楽しみです。

面白かった

I've got copies of all the Dune movies released on disc, so far. As a general rule, if you have not read the books (or talked a lot to people, or done other study) the movies are impossible to follow. Or, at the very least, you won't know how what you are seeing fits into a MUCH larger picture. Part of this is due to the general inability of movies to capture the depth, breadth, subtlety, history, context, side elements, etc. of books. Books often have "narration" explaining the situations/context/circumstances, and the internal thoughts and feelings of characters. Movies tend to include only the most superficial plot elements, and over emphasize the parts that include action. I can very easily imagine people liking the movies, and not having a clue how much is glossed over or completely missing. Mentats, for example. There are 30 (or is it 23?) Dune books. The first 6 were written by Frank Herbert. The rest are written by his son Brian with help from Kevin J. Anderson. Almost everyone (to my knowledge) agree the first 6 are "better". The rest purportedly lack the same "creative genius", mostly expanding details of established plot elements, but are considered worth the read. All-in-all, Dune is considered (by many) to be, the best example of "world building" story telling, ever, bar none (Star Trek, Star Wars, etc.; Even Hobbits/Rings), for scale, scope, depth, complexity, subtly, grandeur, vision etc. Volume one is 592 pages. The 1984 Lynch film covers book one. The director took "serious" liberties with a major plot element ("the weirding way", leaving out some things, and inventing others.). I did read numerous commentaries about the the 84 film, before seeing it. I was able to tell where in the narrative the movie was, but that is the most I can say. Much later (after seeing the BBC versions) I became aware of, and watched, the (even less well known) "Spice Driver Fan Edit" version of the (not well known) extended version of the 1984 movie. The Fan Edit rendition is a BIG improvement over the 1984 film. But, to be fair, by this time I knew a lot more about the "big picture" of the story, so I could better "appreciate" what I was seeing. The 2000 BBC mini-series, being longer, did more-and-better justice to the story. (IMHO, BBC consistently does "a good job"). The 2003 BBC mini-series, (same cast with one exception) also being longer, also did commendable justice to the story. Together these cover books one and three but still left a lot out. By the time I saw these (years after their release), I knew enough to appreciate this rendition. I get the feeling that the "theme" of book 2 is generally included in both the Lynch and BBC screen renditions. The 2021 and 2024 Villeneuve films together cover book one. These films are more visually striking that earlier efforts. WOW! The scope and scale of things can be incredible. And having 2 movies to work with (more time), they did a better justice to the "entire" story of volume one (but still left a lot out). The anticipated 3rd film is purported to address book 2. Now (Dec 2024) HBO is doing a 6 episode TV series of based on the 17th book, which is set 10,000 years from now and 10,000 years before the story lines of the other movies. Again, monumental scope. When eventually available, I'll get these on disc. But, for me, this is the least "wow" of all the screen renditions. I never actually read the books (reading learning disability). Having done a lot of reading of synopses and commentaries, talked to many other fans, and having seen every screen version more than once, I now have a much better idea of the "bigger picture". And can, therefore, appreciate all the films (needing/making allowance for Lynch's liberties). If I ever become a trillionaire, I'll make the entire story using as many movies/episodes are are required to make the movie-equivalent of an unabridged version of the story.

Bardzo dobry film - niestety bez Polskich napisów :(

J'avais vu le 1 au cinéma. Je ne sais plus me déplacer pour le moment, mais J'avais envie de voir la suite. Voilà chose faite. J'ai beaucoup aimé mais j'aime beaucoup la science fiction.

Entertaining, more developed remake of the Dune series. A bit long at times but a good flick. It's pretty much an essential watch if you've seen the first part of the Dune remake which definitely leaves you hanging if you're familiar with the plot of the original Dune movie.

Déjà le premier est un chef d'œuvre...la suite l'est tout autant... 10/10...