🚀 Elevate Your Connectivity Experience!
The KuWFi 2-Pack 300Mbps Wireless Bridge is an outdoor CPE WiFi kit designed for long-range connectivity, supporting up to 1KM transmission distance. With multiple operation modes, weatherproof design, and compatibility with Starlink routers, it offers a reliable solution for various networking needs, including surveillance and IP camera integration.
Color | CPE120 |
Connectivity Technology | Wireless |
RAM Memory Installed | 64 MB |
Control Method | App |
Data Transfer Rate | 300 Megabytes Per Second |
AntennaType | Internal |
Maximum Upstream Data Transfer Rate | 3E+2 Megabits Per Second |
Voltage | 24 Volts |
Frequency | 2.4 Hz |
Wireless Compability | 802.11n |
Is Modem Compatible | No |
Controller Type | Switch |
Antenna Location | outdoor |
Compatible Devices | Security Camera |
Number of Antennas | 1 |
LAN Port Bandwidth | 10/100 Mbps |
Security Protocol | WPA-PSK, WPA2-PSK |
Is Electric | Yes |
Operating System | RouterOS |
Frequency Band Class | Single-Band |
Number of Ports | 2 |
Additional Features | point to point wireless bridge, Weatherproof, Access Point Mode |
Item Weight | 500 Grams |
Item Dimensions L x W x H | 2"L x 1"W x 10"H |
D**E
Easy
Easy to install, the included tools were a big help!
D**.
These are fantastic, not just for the value
I have been building a complex wifi network in a remote area with many connecting areas that are each on average around 1200ft distance from each other. I purchased these, as well as the TP Link CE210 to compare the differences in features and quality. Both antennae's perform about the same in connection speeds from my test. 1200ft with both antenna's point towards each has been easy to reach with both the Kuwfi and the TP-Link. The CE210 is rated for 15km in comparison to the Kuwfi 2k, but I have yet to test at anything close to that range. It is still possible the CE210 will still reach farther distances for the kuwfi, but at the distances I generally need to go I don't notice a difference between connection and speed between the two.Where they are harder to compare is in features. The kuwfi packs a lot for the value, but has a few quirks with the software and interface that I am still figuring out. Overall, the kuwfi has an easy to connect host and client mode that can be selected without logging in to the interface. This is super useful, as it also has an automatic pairing that makes connecting two together a breeze. Where I have had difficulties, is when multiples of the devices are connected, yet running independent from their pairing, I have ran into IP conflicts because each host wants to use the 192.168.10.253 IP by default. I was able to put them in a DHCP mode, but there are still little quirks I have been working out and the interface can be tedious to use. In comparison to other devices I have used, this seems less straight forward for some reason.Here is what I like most about these antenna's. Two antenna's in host and client mode can connect independently of broadcasted SSID name on each device. This means each end of the connection can host its own Wifi name, which can be matched to the area it is sitting in. I have not been able to do this on the TP-Link yet, as I have only been able to connect in repeater mode which requires it to be the same SSID. It is a small thing, but I really like having that flexibility for what I am using it for. Another feature I like, is the extra ethernet throughput port on the antenna itself. This means you can connect at the POE point, as well as link another antenna to another that is next to it, or hard wire into a security camera. The TP-Link in comparison only allows connection at the POE side. This can be fine for most things, but the kuwfi seems to be useful in more situations. However, the TP-Link is a solid choice to use if you are taking it straight into a home router anyway. The TP-Link has a very solid build feeling to it as well, and is a little more straight forward in certain ways if you are just wanting to use it in client mode. The web interface is very easy to use on the TP-Link as well. However, the TP-Link does not do multi SSD, so there is no access point when it is in client or repeater mode. This can be a good or a bad thing.Both units are excellent for different uses, and it has become difficult to chose which ones to get for upcoming projects. Both devices are great, and I have been very impressed with their range.
D**O
If it's your lucky day, buy these
Luck is the only possible way to get these set up on your household. Wifi reception tranmission signal is readily detectable, but no amount of tinker will get them to work with a high end Networks Nighthawk 6000 tri band system, in WAN, LAN, bridge, or any other means. Their presence DOES seem to degrade download speeds of regular network connections, however ( bonus ). I think I spent more time on Google and YouTube on trying to get this to work than everything else I did this year on either search or DIY video research. Forget the intructions; as usual, the source makes nothing more than a cursory effort to present information in an english way. It is a tiresome repetitive pattern with this country's copied cheap versions of other people's technology. The bad labeling and language and arts expertise of a backward 5 year old child in all efforts to explain how this works creates a stress level that approaches the all-too-familiar "packaging rage" syndrom caused by typical Chicom clamshell plastics (impervious). The box, however, is nice, and no clamshells are present.I suspect if you were a Network Ninja Master, you might somehow get this to work. It should be noted, you will find NO video of this system actually operating on any YouTube video, with typical American mainstream ISP, home wired/wireless broadband router scenario. For speed and simplicity, give up and just bury your own ethernet cable to the barn/garage/shop/etc. with just about any second router ( in the case you want multiple wired and wireless access in the remort location) If you just want your laptop, run the cable and plug it in. Cat E or better, with a 100-300 MPS or better provider will work fine for casual "outbuilding" use.
S**P
Wireless Bridge Works
I have two computers, a NAS, and a network laser printer that do not have wireless capability. In my current house, I have an Ethernet cable running from the router on the 1st floor to a network switch on the second floor. My computers, printer, and NAS are connected to the switch. The house we recently purchased and will be moving into next week is a single floor house without an easy way to run Ethernet from the room with the router to my office. This wireless bridge replaced the Ethernet cable for me. The instructions were a little difficult to understand. They indicate that you should connect the master unit directly to a computer and use a browser on the computer to connect to 192.168.0.20 to access the configuration menu for the bridge. I was unsuccessful in doing so.
K**S
100% plug & play. Works excellent.
I've installed 3 of these now; 2 on my own property and 1 on my neighbors. They really do work great. Just a few things to keep in mind:- they do NOT work for 5g cameras; only 2.4GHz compatible ones- you will need to also buy longer ethernet cords and possibly a wifi router- both bridges project their own wifi, just like a router. You can connect the client Bridge to a wifi router, but it may not be necessary (unless you need to have wifi inside of a metal pole barn)- do not bother changing the IP address etc. that is shown in the provided setup video; it is NOT necessary for most applications.- the default password for both bridges is 6666666 (that's eight 6's)I took the time to correct the (poorly) translated photos they've provided as setup instructions in hopes it saves yoi a bit of time and annoyance. (Along with one of my *own* that I found on accident; I am no expert, but I know it works 😂)I also added a list of items you will need to order along with this wifi bridge kit.First pic shows the wifi reception from the bridge I installed for my neighbor today 😁Hope this helps.
ترست بايلوت
منذ يومين
منذ يوم واحد