FANMIS Mens Luxury Watches Rotatable Bezel Sapphire Glass Luminous Hand Quartz Silver Tone Stainless Steel Watch

The watch is handsome! I removed links and it was still too loose. I wrote to the seller and they replied with close up photos how to move the pin in the clasp. I got fast replies and accurate English with directions. I am impressed today the least. For little money, it looks expensive.Very happy customer.

Well made and quality

You know for $40 with a Japanese quartz movement this watch is not a bad buy. I will be changing this flimsy band for a nice leather nato strap though.

My more expensive watch stopped working and I didn’t want to spend much . So I got this one for the mean time and it’s fine . This is the style I always buy , so for now it’s fine. I just wish it lit up in the dark. Otherwise can’t go wrong for the cost.

Cheap CHICOM fun I ordered for a giggle after reading some disparaging comments in different forums! Watch arrived nicely packed in box with tag and watch protectively wrapped in tape. Caseback is NOT the same as pictured (which is Rolex-type), which is just fine by me, as the battery can now be easily replaced using a standard notched watch tool. Caseback *appears* to be a screwback, and is marked "Japan 2115 All Stainless Steel 3ATM Water Resistant," which directly contradicts the watch dial, which states:"1000ft=300mSuperlative ChronometerOfficially Certified"Bottom of dial states "Japan Movt"Note that a 3ATM rating means this watch should only be exposed to "Accidental Splashes and Contact with Rain," according to Seiko's waterproof guide - no swimming or showering with this watch!If the caseback and dial info is true, then this watch sports a Miyota MIY 2115 quartz movement, which can be replaced new for less than two sawbucks. The battery replacement should be the inexpensive 377 (SR626) cell.Watch arrived set for standard Central time (shipped from Indybanana). Crown spins freely when pushed all the way in. Pulled out one stop and reversed (counterclockwise) to previous date, then pull all the way and turned hands clockwise to advance date, which clicked over at midnight - nice!Date magnification (the 'cyclops') is, like most, glued onto the crystal (which i sincerely doubt is sapphire), but offers less than 2X magnification.Bezel is loosey-goosey 60-click unidirectional, about on a par with my Timex Men's T2M563 Dress Sports Black Dial Black Leather Strap Watch (which cost a Jefferson less when purchased, btw).Bracelet is clickety thin-stamped stainless, but nice. You can remove links but may not need to, as the clasp has more than an inch and a half of adjustable holes for the clasp pin. Hollow endlinks of course.The surprise is the lume. All markers, hands, and even the 0/60 mark (the bezel 'pearl') is lumed - and, astonishingly, nearly on a par with Casio Men's MDV106-1A Stainless Steel Watch (of which i have several, as these are destined to be classic inexpensive dive watches worth *far* more than the paltry three Hamiltons i paid for each).So what we have here is a fun watch; cheap, inexpensive, and a beater homage to that financially unaffordable 116610LV costing nearly 242 times as much (at retail, mind you). I give it 5 stars for what it is!

Nice heft to it out of the package. Magnifier on the date is perfect. In general looks great, runs nicely.However, hope it fits you right out of the pack, because there aren't enough removable links. Though 5 links have "arrows," only 3 of them are actually removable. And if you get excited that maybe you can get around it by using the OVER 2 full links' worth of microadjustment holes on the clasp, you're out of luck. The way this particular clasp works means you can only use the holes on the 12 o'clock side, but you can't use all of the holes available because the last link will be in the way of the clasp folding flat and engaging the "locking" mechanism. My options appear to be to either replace the band completely or destroy a link by opening and removing one of the nonadjustable links on the 6 o'clock side of the band to make it fit.

The first one I got has a defective spring holder whole on the case, and the bracelet spring popped out constantly. I returned it with no problem, and I got an immediate replacement even before sent back the first one. Kudos to the company.The second wan was in perfect condition.I had the real deal Submariner before, and this hommage got the look and feel. Of course, no point in comparing them - they are in different leagues. This Reginald watch is not waterproof; definitely not to 300 m. Without a screw-down crown, it is impossible anyway. But after 9 months of everyday abuse, it still looks good, with no scratches on the glass or the bezel. Somebody was upset about the crystal not being sapphire. Helloooo! A sapphire crystal would cost more than the whole watch.I lost the dot from the bezel after 6 months, but it was easy to replace it with some fluorescent paint/superglue mix (see photo). Some review says the watch is not luminous. I don't know - if you keep it in the dark, maybe not, but if it is exposed to sunlight for a while and you go to a dark place, it is pretty bright for about 5 min. The hands are brighter than the dots. (See pictures.) Yes, the clasp is flimsy, but again what do you expect for this price? A new Submariner start around 20K. Even a used one costs at least 8K. For that money, they really have somewhat better clasps :DIt actually beats the Submariner's accuracy. Of course, the automatic movement is inherently less accurate than a quartz movement, so it is not a real victory. During the nine months (268 days exactly), it gained 56 seconds. In other words, it is accurate to 0.2 seconds per day! Even for a quartz watch, it is excellent. In summary, it is a real deal for less than $40.

I only just got it, so I can't speak for water resistance or accuracy, but it is a BEAUTIFUL GREEN WATCH. I actually do own a Rolex Blue Submariner, but I've always wanted a good looking green watch too. This is a killer deal at only $39, same look and size as my Sub, and whether it last only a couple of years, or whatever, it looks way better than I imagined. I won't swim in it..........so I don't care about the 200 meter water thing. As for just wanting a beautiful green watch that looks a whole lot more than what it cost........this is a real deal.