Under ArmourMen's Standard Tech 6" Boxerjock, Multipack

I bought these for my husband after "I" "ruined" his old sliders (i.e.: boxer briefs for athletic events). I found this Under Armour version and thought it would be perfect to replace the old raggedy pair he had.This are great! My husband absolutely loves the fit and feel of these. I plan on buying more for him in the future. He said the only down side is he now realizes how flat his butt is because his pants slide off due to the silky material. However, I don't mind the silk ;)

I recently purchased Tech 6" Boxerjocks and Tech Mesh 6" boxerjocks. The traditional Tech Boxerjock is comfortable and has smooth seems. The new Tech Mesh fabric is great but the workmanship is poor. The seams are rough and I find the thread and stitch pattern incredibly uncomfortable. I've attached a photo so you can see the quality for yourself. Both items were purchased directly from Amazon (not a seller) and were packaged as expected.

So these boxers have to be a knock off, because the name is not center. I found out as soon as I put them on lol You literally cannot tell what the brand is lolI exchanged for a 2nd pair and the same thing happened.UPDATE: Even at the store, they are crooked. So apparently UA has crooked ones, so you will have to decide if you are good with them. I kept the second pair

Unfortunately, I did not realize there was a difference in types of Boxerjock's from Under Armour. Since I was focusing on the word "Boxerjocks" and the photos, I soon realized these were not the "Original" Boxerjocks and rather the "Tech" Boxerjocks. The difference is quite substantial to me. I the "Tech" Boxerjocks have very rough and course stitching in the crotch area that itched, rubbed and caused redness and irritation to my skin. The "Original" Boxerjocks are more soft to the touch, and use a different type of stitching that is very soft, non-abrasive and smooth to the skin.I highly recommend avoiding these and going with the "Original" Boxerjocks from Under Armour for their comfort and quality, which is far superior to this "Tech" version.

First time to buy Under Armour underwear & the last. The legs creep up worse than any underwear I’ve ever bought & im constantly tugging them down. Way too expensive a product to be so uncomfortable. The fabric is soft but the waistband comes w a very stiff label that even after I cut it off left a spot that rubs. Most good boxer briefs now come w a printed label & UnderArmour needs to catch up. I will not buy again.

This underwear is super comfortable, is great for the gym and for every day wear. It's moisture wicking so it doesn't absorb sweat, and keeps your body dry. The best part of these is that they don't have any seams running down the butt/back of legs, as most other performance boxer briefs have. This means they don't dig into your skin at all. They ride up a tiny bit in the legs, but stay put for the most part and are pretty flattering.My waist is about 32-33", I wear 31W pants usually and these fit me well in M. They are pretty snug, but stretch out a lot and are fairly comfortable.Just updating my review to add that I wouldn't recommend these in hot (80F or higher) weather, they are a bit too tight for that and don't have enough mesh to breathe around your legs. I usually don't find them too noticeable, but during warm weather they're slightly uncomfortable. I think UA makes a mesh version that would be much better. In hot weather I prefer Pair of Thieves' superfit mesh underwear, but UA's boxerjocks are still good. I just think I'd go with the mesh version if I were to buy these again. I also wonder if a shorter length would make them more comfortable in warm weather

Newer, flat front golf shorts made of stretchy synthetic materials are nice, but bring at least one disadvantage, which is that their slightly snug fit causes old-fashioned cotton boxer shorts to bunch up in uncomfortable places. One cannot be worn with the other. A friend told me about these shorts, and although I had a negative history with boxer briefs, these Under Armour shorts are a perfect solution. They are a gazillion times more comfortable than the boxer briefs which first came on the scene about 20 years ago, which were no more comfortable than wearing nothing but a pair of baseball sliding shorts. The difference maker is the pouch in the front; it is well designed and performs as expected and hoped.

Nice and cool fit keeps the jewels happy.

For me this is without question the best men’s underwear on the market. I’ve tried many similar products from other brands but come back to this every time. Now I won’t even consider any other manufacturer.These are so comfortable, stylish and adaptable to whatever you’re doing. For sport they are superb, keeping you dry and supported. I wear them for yoga and to go running and they’re ideal for both.In daily use they’re just as good. They don’t pinch around the thighs or tear out your leg hair painfully, never bunch or sag and when you wash them they dry within an hour. I have several pairs which I bought at least 7 years ago which I’ve been wearing ever since. My wife can not believe it because they look no more than six months old. The waistbands are like new still and there is no fraying, sagging or elastic damage at all.If you keep an eye on them in your wish list the prices often come down too and I usually purchase when they’re around £12 a pair.Sizing is as you’d expect. I wear a 32” waist (5’10” tall) in normal trousers and I buy the size medium.In short, even at twice the price, these would be a bargain. Try them and prepare to become a convert. Stylish, well made and exceptionally comfortable. Recommended. I hope this has been helpful.

I first decided to tried a pair of Under Armour (UA) boxers about 4-5 years ago, and since I have been a convert. Historically I wore Calvin Klein's (cotton) and thought nothing of it. Like back then, these UAs are comfortable and fit my figure well, for reference I am a 36" - 38" waist and 5,11 tall and ordered XL. I paid £22.83 January 2020 for a pack (box contained 2 pairs), which is roughly £11.40 a pair. A price I am not overly thrilled at as other brands are a lot cheaper. In comparison I paid £15 for three pairs of Danish Endurance trunk to see if they could be a cheaper alternative to these UAs (spoiler they were not).I have no issues with the material causing discomfort or chaffing. The polyester is not overly thick or too thin and does not go see-through like woman's yoga pants do. The boxers sit softly against the skin, and I have not notice these ridding up during usage, or any of the other pairs I own for that matter. I wear these during gym workouts or just generally as everyday items (under a suit or jeans), that is how comfortable I find them. I am glad UA are doing some plain matching colours now (waist band and main body panel), for that awkward moment in the gym when your t-shirt rides up during weight sets.Overall a good buy, but keep an eye on the price and try to pick them up in the sale!

I gave these ago after being struck down by chub rub / chappies / or as normal people call it, thigh rub.As a slightly more plumb man trying to loose some weight, i have had my fair share of trouble with the thighs coming together to stop me. Almost like they don't want to go. I use to try powders etc, or id wear cycling shorts if i was playing football/running.Until i found these beautys.... i am now converted! underwear and support combined to keep these thighs from kissing. They are very comfortable, provide support to hamstrings/quads and keep that chub rub at bay.They are a bit pricey at first (i paid £22 for 2 pairs) however they are worth the money. I now have 6 pairs.Use -Either as normal underwear, or if you know your going to be active, say lunch time run or so.I would recommend these. im 34" waist, and i wear medium, they are snuggly.

Good quality. Does exactly what it says on the tin. I have long legs, and these come about half way down to me knee.I don't like compression fit, so I bought 1 size bigger, and this is perfectly comfortable. I do get a bit of pinching of the hairs on my leg, but this is the case with all underwear which is made from lycra/polyester. Keeps my junk well organised in the pouch, and makes it look bigger too. Bonus!

I bought 10 pairs of the original black/red 6'' trunks in 2014 and they have only just started to show signs of wear. I decided to replace them with the new version on Cyber Monday which were reduced by around £7. 00 per twin-pack.They are 90% the same but don't have the textured pouch which I preferred on the old ones and the huge labels are irritating too.They do offer the same level of comfort and support, which is excellent and I'm sure they'll provide the same quick drying and odour resistant qualities of the originals and if they last as long I'll be very pleased.