Full description not available
D**L
Poorly proofed
This is a good idea, altho’ jolly expensive.The problem is the quality of the proofing. There is an answer grid on p75 which occasionally disagrees with the answer given in the long form answer section. Some of the diagrams lack a vital element. If you work thro’ the questions conscientiously and then attempt to mark them from the grid, you can be misled into thinking you were wrong, which turns into a huge waste of valuable study time.The advice on approach is cursory and obvious. Feels v much like a money-making machine.Simply check the ENGAA specification and use the past papers Cambridge put up, then iteratively revise any topics you get wrong.I contacted UniAdmissions (who the authors work for?/with?/own?) to share my concerns. Within seconds they had emailed to push their services, then within an hour called to push their services then called later that evening again… you get the picture. They had no interest in helping with my concerns about the book.Happily Amazon understood immediately and were happy to refund.
Trustpilot
3 weeks ago
2 months ago